XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: sam@spade.invalid
None wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> (Message-ID:):
>
> > None wrote:
> > > On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> > > (Message-ID:):
> > >
> > > > Attila wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 01:06:13 -0700, Samuel Spade
> > > > > in alt.atheism with message-id
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > None wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> > > > > > > (Message-ID:):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > None wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > LOL! It's amazing that here in the 21st century, supposed
grown
> > > > > > > > > > adults
> > > > > > > > > > believe in 1-week creation and The Flood. Then they try to
convince
> > > > > > > > > > atheists!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Andrew & Robert, you guys are more fun than a barrel of
monkeys.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Science and history support the days of creations.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Okay, I'll bite. I get to deny that, then you cite proof from
true,
> > > > > > > > non-looney science and history sources that supports the 6 day
> > > > > > > > creation,
> > > > > > > > and you can make me look like a damn fool. Ready?...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No Rob, that's false. Science and history do not support the
Genesis
> > > > > > > > creation mythology.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Waiting...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, Robster, where's the beef? My invitation sits unrequited...
all you
> > > > > > have to do is prove science & history support creation, like you
said it
> > > > > > does, and I will be all humble and humiliated and everything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can do it!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Plant life cannot survive
> > > > > > > > > 24 hours without the Sun.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also false.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then you are not knowledgeable about plant life and the total
absence of
> > > > > > > Light.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you a biologist now? Any healthy green plant can survive 24
hours
> > > > > > of darkness. You could conjure up a solar eclipse that long and
prove
> > > > > > it!
> > > > >
> > > > > Excuse me - a solar eclipse only lasts a short time and a
> > > > > total eclipse can only last minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > However there have been numerous occasions when the sun was
> > > > > blocked for over a day - such as during some volcano
> > > > > eruptions.
> > > >
> > > > A magic eclipse, like the one in Luke 23, can last for 3 hours.
> > > >
> > > > "44 And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all
> > > > the earth until the ninth hour. 45 And the sun was darkened, and the
> > > > veil of the temple was rent in the midst."
> > >
> > > Properly translated from greek to todays English it would read "it
covered
> > > the land” or a "darkness covered the all the land”
> >
> > Irrelevant. The whole earth, or whole land, was dark from noon to 3pm.
> > Now how do you think that happened?
>
> It is not irrelevant, for the whole earth was not darkened.
>
> As to how it happened you can check if you have the smarts from NASA’s
> website. You know this from jumping in on a reply to Dawn/
Now you're back to claiming it was a 3 hour eclipse, near the time of a
full moon?
This boy just doesn't know whether he's coming or going.
> > So you admit it wasn't a solar eclipse. Did the sun turn off? The
> > "firmament" became opaque? No explanation besides "magic"?
>
> Another false troll comment and insertion. Bye
What did I tell you before about posting angry?
Wipe those tears and climb back on your soapbox, double down on the
magic eclipses, and sharpen your apologetics.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
