[continued from previous message]   
      
   > > > > > Shiloh has been positively identified with modern Khirbet   
   > > > > > Seilun, a tell known in Modern Hebrew as Tel Shiloh. It is   
   > > > > > located 31 kilometres (19 mi) north of Jerusalem, in the   
   > > > > > West Bank, to the west of the modern Israeli settlement town   
   > > > > > of Shilo and to the north of the Palestinian town of Turmus   
   > > > > > Ayya. Another physical site that seems verified.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Such as what "around it"? The site alone says nothing about   
   > > > > > what may or may not have occurred there.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > To keep it simple, the site of the temple at Shiloh as I said before   
   does   
   > > > > have many signs of what had occurred there. That it was a Jewish   
   Temple,   
   > > > > and   
   > > > > their practices were far different that any other religion of its Day.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I am glad to hear that you did do some limited research on these   
   things.   
   > > >   
   > > > No research is necessary. You are attempting to draw   
   > > > unwarranted conclusions.   
   > >   
   > > False as I told you or others here what a couple of the indicators were.   
   > > They   
   > > were facts, and not conclusions drawn by me.   
   >   
   > So you say but I have yet to see any supporting evidence.   
   > How do I know you are not lying?   
      
   When have you ever believed I was not lying and accepted what I said?   
   >   
   >   
   > What are the "many signs"? What "occurred there"?   
      
   Go yo you tube and look for a video on the Shiloh digs and see for yourself.   
   Then in the comment section you can argue with them about then not seeing   
   what they saw.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > And that is just a couple of the   
   > > > > > > finds.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > To do so I would have to re-research it all, to generate a   
   list as I   
   > > > > > > > > do   
   > > > > > > > > not   
   > > > > > > > > keep physical records of what I have learned in the past, as   
   the Lord   
   > > > > > > > > consistently gives me new insights none of which conflict with   
   was is   
   > > > > > > > > known,   
   > > > > > > > > but adds increases in the knowledge and understandings of what   
   went   
   > > > > > > > > before.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Given that much of what I post you is not remembered, nor   
   honored   
   > > > > > > > > enough   
   > > > > > > > > to   
   > > > > > > > > be remembered of what value would be all this added info that   
   you are   
   > > > > > > > > already   
   > > > > > > > > opposed to and discredited even before you see it since is all   
   > > > > > > > > 'myths'.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Yet you throw out your comment as if it is the answer to   
   > > > > > > > everything rather than nothing.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > It is all based on personal experiences with God, and that is   
   nothing   
   > > > > > > that   
   > > > > > > you can relate to.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Are you going to address this or just continue to ignore   
   it?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Paleo-anthropology purports to gives us "discoveries"   
   that   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > agree with their a-priori philosophical script, rather   
   than on   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > true, legitimate science.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)