XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 15, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:<8dmfck914t4ba7mqr5l761tk4f1siepsk1@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 23:10:30 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a8akm$1nm5t$3@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<5njcck575u9snon751caietialq248r13j@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<3bkbckt2n02g98v0ojfg82n636bajq4q1i@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 12:21:10 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4g76$krjv$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Can you cite the peer reviewed evidence, or any actual   
   evidence,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > that the Garden of Eden ever existed, and that is where   
   man was   
   > > > > > > > > > > > created? If not, you're just gullible, according to your   
   own   
   > > > > > > > > > > > standards.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > LOL, everything in the Bible is peer reviewed.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > By who? Where?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > By its peers wherever they dwelt or currently dwell.   
   > > > > > > > > Its peers are peers, just like peers in psychology fields need   
   to be   
   > > > > > > > > peers   
   > > > > > > > > of   
   > > > > > > > > the respective fields in order to understand what was written.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > The Bible's peers are established characters like the Quran, the   
   > > > > > > > Bhagavad Gita, and "Dianetics". They blessed the Holy Scripture   
   and   
   > > > > > > > stamped it with their Impramatur.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Wrong, spoken from total ignorance. Like a chemist peer reviewing   
   > > > > > > astronomy.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Then you tell me, who are the Bible's peers?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Every book in the OT was peer reviewed for over 1,000 years initially   
   by   
   > > > > the   
   > > > > tribe of Levites as well as all the prophets and has been reviewed   
   since   
   > > > > by   
   > > > > the peoples of God.   
   > > >   
   > > > The older books of the OT were passed orally for centuries before being   
   > > > written down. None of the OT was written down before the 10th century   
   > > > BCE at the earliest. Most of it was written during or after the   
   > > > Babylonian exile. The Torah didn't reach its final form until that   
   > > > time.   
   > >   
   > > Exo 24:4 And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD, and rose up early in   
   the   
   > > morning, and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according   
   > > to the twelve tribes of Israel.   
   > >   
   > > Deu 31:9 And Moses wrote this law, and delivered it unto the priests the   
   > > sons   
   > > of Levi, which bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and unto all the   
   > > elders of Israel.   
   > >   
   > > This was all done well before the Israelites left the desert land. IOW   
   > > within   
   > > the first 40 years. And Exodus was written in the earlier days.   
   > >   
   > > Moses was well trained and educated so that he could rule in Egypt as part   
   > > of   
   > > the Pharaohs family from the time of his birth.   
   >   
   > There is no definitive historical or archaeological evidence   
   > outside the Hebrew Bible to confirm the existence of Moses   
   > as a historical figure. The consensus among biblical   
   > scholars and historians is that Moses is most likely a   
   > legendary or composite figure whose story, along with the   
   > Exodus, is a mythologized account containing kernels of   
   > truth that were exaggerated over time. While some argue that   
   > a Moses-like figure may have existed, the lack of   
   > contemporary corroborating sources makes it impossible to   
   > prove his existence as described in religious texts.   
      
   Funny that, why do you reference people who do not meet your defined   
   statements of what it takes to prove something is real and viable, yet you   
   use them as your evidential support that justifies your belief system? And   
   you cannot see your hypocrisy therein?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)