XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 15, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 22:52:32 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a89j0$1nm5t$1@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 12:35:26 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a75dt$1fga8$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<3blcck577s2bdnm06atb58v148ubl7o0nf@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:25:59 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4r1n$ok2p$2@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:<3bkbckt2n02g98v0ojfg82n636bajq4q1i@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 12:21:10 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4g76$krjv$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:26:11 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:10a2dt4$3   
   j$1@dont-email.me...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into   
   Google AI and see   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my   
   question.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological   
   discoveries", followed   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > by   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible   
   masses!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...>  which of their   
   ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back   
   > > > > > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Can you cite the peer reviewed evidence, or any actual   
   evidence,   
   > > > > > > > > > that the Garden of Eden ever existed, and that is where man   
   was   
   > > > > > > > > > created? If not, you're just gullible, according to your own   
   > > > > > > > > > standards.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > LOL, everything in the Bible is peer reviewed.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > By who? Where?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > By its peers wherever they dwelt or currently dwell.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Not an answer. Be specific.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Do you really lack the power of reason?   
   > > >   
   > > > Do you lack the power of comprehension? Do you know what   
   > > > peer review is?   
   > >   
   > > I asked you that.   
   >   
   > Peer review is a critical quality control process in which a   
   > scholarly work, such as a research paper, is evaluated by   
   > experts in the same field (peers) before publication to   
   > ensure its validity, originality, and methodological   
   > soundness.   
      
   peer review noun[mass noun] evaluation of scientific, academic, or   
   professional work by others working in the same field:   
      
   (peer-review) verb [with object]   
   subject to a peer review: (peer-reviewed as adjective):a peer-reviewed   
   journal.   
      
   > You claim such a review was done on your bible. Where is   
   > this documented and who did it?   
      
   If you knew the history of the Jews, you would know that they continuously   
   were critical, the Priests and Prophets of scripture, and acknowledged which   
   were of God or of man aka apocryphal. NT the writers frequently named the   
   others in their books or letters which established that so and so wrote/did   
   what.   
      
   That is a light overview of it all.   
      
   Now a personal comment. If you were honest, sincere, etc. You would not   
   condemn a work of anyone without personally reviewing all the particulars,   
   especially when you have no expertise in the areas you criticize or downplay.   
   That applies to us all.   
   >   
   > Remember, a peer review is entirely separate from the   
   > document being reviewed   
      
   Hated to break up this sentence of yours but the section above? Think about   
   it.   
   > and cannot be done by anyone who   
   > contributed to the document in any way.   
      
   What honest person would do that?   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Its peers are peers, just like peers in psychology fields need to   
   be   
   > > > > > > peers   
   > > > > > > of the respective fields in order to understand what was written.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > As usual your so-called "evidence" requires a belief in your   
   > > > > > silly superstition to be accepted.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I answered the question of peer review, I also gave and example of it,   
   > > > > that   
   > > > > meets the requirements of“peer” review. Something that you all say   
   > > > > that   
   > > > > you understand what it means as well as the process thereof, yet cannot   
   > > > > fathom what it is   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Here is definition, in other words, of peer review within believers   
   > > > > community, from the Bible.   
   > > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)