XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: sam@spade.invalid   
      
   None  wrote:   
   > On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > (Message-ID:):   
   >   
   > > None   wrote:   
   > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > (Message-ID:<64kcckddt1a89o3eqr9ru08c5cssmato7f@4ax.com>):   
   > > >   
   > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<415ackd3pmqn6hhtfgtifth1hqhrfn5ogg@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me>):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > (snip)   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back to   
   Africa,   
   > > > > > > > > > > which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > That is a total rewrite of Human history, migratory   
   patterns, etc,   
   > > > > > > > > > even DNA   
   > > > > > > > > > disproves that thinking. And so does the DNA and genomes of   
   chimps and   
   > > > > > > > > > humans.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You are confusing Bible mythology with human history. The   
   Bible is not   
   > > > > > > > > a history book.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Your assumptions does not truth make. Assumptions of this sort   
   are based   
   > > > > > > > on ignorance whether willful or or simple lack of knowledge.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You didn't know there's a huge body of recorded knowledge that's   
   not   
   > > > > > > based on the bible at all? Much of it is personal eyewitness info   
   from   
   > > > > > > persons of known identity, unlike the bible. That's not   
   assumptions, Mr.   
   > > > > > > Assumer.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > The subject you were replying about was the Bible which you called a   
   > > > > > mythology out of sheer ignorance.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > No, the subject was human origins. You tried to pass of biblical   
   > > > > mythology as historic fact, which it isn't.   
   > > >   
   > > > Go back and read what you wrote, no history book is fact. It is a   
   historical   
   > > > record which may or not be proven to be a reality, or factual. I did not   
   > > > declare it to be fact. But a peer reviewed book which encompasses many   
   > > > things. The problem here is that you cannot have a discussion without   
   shade.   
   > > > You cannot think about this type of a conversation without prejudice, and   
   > > > that is especially noted when you have not read the entire Bible, even   
   for   
   > > > pleasure. You are unfamiliar with it, its authors, it concepts as you do   
   not   
   > > > know anything about it directly.   
   > >   
   > > I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Other than "you're biased   
   > > and I'm not", you are vague and rambling.   
   >   
   > A prejudicial mindset always creates limitations to understandings.   
   > I’d bet you did not go back and read what you wrote.   
      
   Then stop being so prejudicial, and maybe you'll see.   
      
      
   > Do you ever read, pause and then reread? Your add-on comment was an   
   > assumption that could not be tied to what I wrote.   
      
   Ironic that you should ask.  Do you ever read what you post?  It's full   
   of miswordings, extra missing or misplaced words, mangled sentences,   
   sentence fragments, vague meanderings, obfuscations, dissemblance,   
   tangential half-thoughts, and general word salad.   
      
      
   > > Is there something concrete that you're disagreeing with?   
   >   
   > It was written for clarification and understandings.   
      
      
   Except you don't clarify anything.   
      
   If you disagree, please clarify why Jerusalem got dark for 3 hours   
   during the crucifixion.  The answer is 1 line or less, no obfuscation.   
      
      
   > > > As an aside, I just finished reading an article here;   
   > > > https://getpocket.com/explore/item/physics-is-pointing-inexorably-to-mind   
   > > > Titled: Physics Is Pointing Inexorably to Mind   
   > > >   
   > > > What I found so interesting was all of his educational experience   
   combined   
   > > > with research and he came up with an understanding I had realized by the   
   > > > 7th   
   > > > grade.Yet he missed the deep realities of it, but came close. I don’t   
   know   
   > > > it you can read it and understand it, but it curiosity gets the better of   
   > > > it, take a read.   
   > >   
   > > "Math is real but matter is not." A vague philosophical essay. And...?   
   >   
   > OK, but I hoped. To discuss this would take a whole other dedicated thread to   
   > explain in simpler terms.   
   > Ever hear of a world within a world?   
   > Ever hear that one can identify the fingerprints of a designer in their   
   > created works?   
      
   It's not science.  It's just a deadend rabbit hole.   
      
   It's pointless to try having a serious discussion with you, li'l buddy.   
   You just aren't equipped for it.   
      
   So, to answer the obvious question, you figure it out.   
      
   Are we having fun yet?   
      
      
   > Combined with the knowledge of how limestone is formed.   
      
   You put de lime in de coconut and drink em right down.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)