XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:56:51 +0000, jojo  wrote:   
      
   >None wrote:   
   >> On Sep 12, 2025, None wrote   
   >> (Message-ID: <10a2usm$5del$4@dont-email.me>):   
   >>   
   >>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   >>> (Message-ID: <10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me>):   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 9/12/2025 3:47 PM, Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:109vgq9$2vl7u$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>> Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That the origins of all human beings can be traced back to Africa, which   
   >>>> is where the first modern humans arose.   
   >>>   
   >>> That is a total rewrite of Human history, migratory patterns, etc, even DNA   
   >>> disproves that thinking. And so does the DNA and genomes of chimps and   
   >>> humans.   
   >>   
   >> Off topic for this thread and denoted why in the subject.   
   >> We have all been conned. Using scientific explanations to support the con.   
   >>   
   >> Just read this as it was part of an article.   
   >>   
   >> "Cosimo Posth, an archaeogenetics expert at the University of Tübingen, in   
   >> Germany, and colleagues described the genomes of ten different individuals   
   >> who lived in three key regions: Siberia’s Altai Mountains, the Kamchatka   
   >> Peninsula and other parts of the Russian Far East. Environmental   
   >> conditions—cold climates at high latitudes—allowed for optimal   
   >> preservation of DNA that was hundreds to thousands of years old. “In these   
   >> environments you can find individuals with 70 to 80 percent of human DNA in   
   >> their bones, comparable to what you’d get if you extracted saliva from you   
   >> or me,” says Posth. “You can actually generate a genome of the same   
   >> quality as a modern genome. It’s amazing stuff.”"   
   >>   
   >> If this be true then the tests are missing 20-30% of the info From saliva   
   >> tests. So all may not be as it seems. It is only a test of a likelihood a   
   >> best guess type of thing. Compound that with the spit tests of a husband and   
   >> wife and that can compound the error significantly and a good statistician   
   >> will confirm that. Yeah, science is end all be all. Who are ya gonna   
   believe?   
   >   
   >you can give another fluid, that is whiteish. that's 100%..   
   >actually you have meiosis there, so there would be slight genetic   
   >variation. anyway, i think 100% dna can be gatehered from spit.   
      
        Specifically, the cells of the mouth that have sluffed off into   
   the saliva.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)