XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 16, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:36:07 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10aaien$2amep$4@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 15, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<90tgck1mtibtpt2d9jeigb0djks76kcaoe@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:40:20 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a9fhk$21cji$4@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 15, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<6jlfckdlsqedsfgft1ithgd92s78a92l3f@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 23:20:40 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a8b7n$1nm5t$6@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 14, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:58:56 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > [...]   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark   
   > > > > > > > > > > landed.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Where did all that water go?   
   > > > > > > > > > How did the animals get to Australia? Madagascar? The   
   > > > > > > > > > Philippines? Japan?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > This will surprise you but those answers are all in the Bible.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Would you be so kind as to cite chapter and verse? I don't recall   
   > > > > > > > anything about how animals got to other continents. All I recall   
   > > > > > > > regarding the water is that it receded. But no mention of where   
   all   
   > > > > > > > this water, that covered everything, actually receded to.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Where is your proof of other continents in that day.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Pangea was a supercontinent, a single landmass of nearly all   
   > > > > > the Earth's continents, that existed from about 335 to 200   
   > > > > > million years ago. Also known as Pangaea, it began to break   
   > > > > > apart around 200 million years ago due to tectonic plate   
   > > > > > movement, a process called continental drift, which   
   > > > > > eventually formed the continents we see today.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > There were few civilizations around 200 million years ago.   
   > > > > > The Mesopotamian civilization, centered in modern-day Iraq,   
   > > > > > is generally considered the earliest civilization, emerging   
   > > > > > around 4000 BCE with the Sumerians.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Where is the proof, that story is all suppositions while there is a   
   > > > > semblance   
   > > > > of partial truth.   
   > > >   
   > > > That is the conclusion of the geological research that has   
   > > > been done and is supported by majority of the scientists   
   > > > involved.   
   > > >   
   > > > > There is no written record of Pangea from that time.   
   > > >   
   > > > There was no one to write it 200 million years ago.   
   > > >   
   > > > > Funny that, yet you   
   > > > > believe what there is not evidence of, not verification, no witnesses   
   of,   
   > > > > etc   
   > > > > etc Nothing there meets your self imposed criteria, and no excuse is   
   > > > > sufficient to override your self defined proofs.   
   > > >   
   > > > How can there be a written record when there would be no one   
   > > > to write it for over 190 million years?   
   > >   
   > > ROTFLOL, Then where did the name come from? 2+2?   
   >   
   > It was assigned in the modern era when geologists first   
   > became aware of continental drift and it's historical   
   > significance.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Where is all their proofs that meet your personal requirements. Like   
   someone   
   > > who was there to witness the events?   
   >   
   > An event such as continental drift does not require   
   > witnesses. It can be understood by studying the phenomena   
   > in the present.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Time did not begin before the first day.   
   >   
   > the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in   
   > the past, present, and future regarded as a whole.   
   >   
   > The measurement of time was possible long before there was   
   > day or night.   
      
   You have no proof of that, and holding you to the same standards that you   
   judge believers with, you failed your own litmus test.   
      
   You could be asked for proofs of that last statement, etc. and you would have   
   evidences,   
      
   We all know that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)