XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/16/2025 7:02 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 9/16/25 6:03 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >> On 9/16/2025 1:31 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>> Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>      If God is the source of   
   >>>   
   >>> The problem with DNA is twofold, and idiots like you can't   
   >>> grasp it but...   
   >>>   
   >>> It's easy to see what DNA is, it's impossible to see how it got   
   >>> there.   
   >>>   
   >>> On the best of days it's guess work.   
   >>>   
   >>> Secondly, DNA simply does not work the way you are ordered to   
   >>> believe it works.   
   >>>   
   >>> For example, there's this chromosome 11 insert, some mtDNA that   
   >>> mutated, jumped over to chromosome 11. It's often called the LM3   
   >>> insert because it groups nicely with the famous "Mungo Man"   
   >>> find in Australia.   
   >>>   
   >>> NOTE:  It is often claimed that this Mungo Man's mtDNA isn't   
   >>> real, it's contamination, but that's literally impossible. See,   
   >>> there was a great deal of time between the mutation that caused   
   >>> the leap over to chromosome 11 and Mungo man. The two are not an   
   >>> exact match.   
   >>>   
   >>> Okay, so this LM3 insert proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that   
   >>> BILLIONS of people are walking around today and can trace their   
   >>> ancestry to an Eurasian ancestor living long, Long, LONG before   
   >>> any Out of Africa "Eve." It even proves that there was a migration   
   >>> INTO Africa!  But it doesn't fit the narrative of the fake science   
   >>> we call paleo anthropology so it's rejected. Ignored... denounced.   
   >>>   
   >>> MOST IMPORTANTLY, nobody would have any clue of this Eurasian   
   >>> ancestry -- there'd be ZERO evidence for it what so ever -- if   
   >>> it weren't for this lucky mutation stuffing some mtDNA into   
   >>> Chromosome 11. THAT is the only reason we know that such an   
   >>> ancestor existed.   
   >>>   
   >>> THINK (speakng rhetorically):  Is this the only and only such   
   >>> ancestor? Could no such invisible ancestors exist without a   
   >>> mutation leaving a hint inside of the nuclear DNA, or is our   
   >>> DNA "Evidence" blinding us to a vast array of facts?   
   >   
   >> Oh, thank you   
   >   
   > You are as ignorant as the day is long. Then you pull down the shade   
   > and still ignorant all through the night...   
   >   
      
   Honey, if you say so!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)