XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: sam@spade.invalid   
      
   None  wrote:   
      
   (sniption)   
   > If you were to go to the source, like here and the scriptures surrounding it,   
   > you would see a far different picture.   
   >   
   > Scripture also speaks from the perspective of the Romans who found no fault   
   > in him. No sedition, nothing. Also verified from Roman history which many try   
   > to discredit so as to destroy the truth for an anti-Jesus narrative.   
      
   What did I tell you?   
      
   Robert thinks everyone shares his conviction that the Bible is the   
   ultimate source for history.   
      
      
   > Liar? What did I lie about?   
   > I have also mentioned here, many, many times that I have personal knowledge   
   > and understandings of God, even if they are limited greatly due to the fact   
   > that I have had a personal experiential relationship with Him and thereby   
   > know the reality of who He is, and that HE exists. Which you very well know   
      
      
   You just can't question a claims of personal knowledge of God, or   
   experiential relationships.  Those must prevail every time.   
      
      
   > and choose to mock on a personal basis, so as to excuse your choice to   
      
   Robert is not mocked!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)