[continued from previous message]   
      
   > reactions to what they see posted in their own newsgroups.   
      
   OH? So you think you know from where peoples comments originate?   
   >   
   >   
   > > > > I do not know if Andrew originated the cross post of not. And he really   
   > > > > shouldn’t.. Paul the apostle is a good example of that, as he debated   
   > > > > those   
   > > > > who were against God in their own temples and places of discourse. He   
   did   
   > > > > not   
   > > > > drag them to a place of worship to God, or to a temple of God, to argue   
   > > > > and   
   > > > > debate. He only stopped doing that, depending of the location when   
   those   
   > > > > he   
   > > > > debated could no longer reasonably debate and sought to kill him   
   because   
   > > > > of   
   > > > > his testimony, works of God, and as a result of his teachings drew many   
   > > > > away   
   > > > > from their false gods and saw their income decreasing. Meaning the meat   
   > > > > markets that sold meat that was offered as a sacrifice to their gods,   
   the   
   > > > > lack of sales of their images of their false gods as well as their   
   charms,   
   > > > > incenses, etc.   
   > > >   
   > > > And you don't think Paul was doing theology when he preached his   
   > > > sermons?   
   > >   
   > > Nope. In those days it was called and was a full part of philosophy, and he   
   > > was well trained in that by one of the masters of that day. Yet he taught   
   > > Jesus Christ an him crucified, and made a point about speaking and teaching   
   > > clear and plainly with simple words, and allowing the power of God to be   
   > > made   
   > > manifest so that people would believe in God and not Paul and his words.   
   IOW   
   > > he humbled himself before men and God so that the Glory of God might shine   
   > > through.   
   >   
   > Once you begin to ask why anyone should be concerned about Christ   
   > crucified, you're down the rabbit hole into theology.   
      
   Only because you follow a certain theological understanding. It is a box that   
   you put other into, including yourself so as to know in your mind how to   
   react to them. And you cannot think outside of the box as you are not   
   permitted to do so.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > If the christians did not enter your NG’s at any time, your group   
   would   
   > > > > close down within a year for there would be nothing for you all to talk   
   > > > > about. ;)   
   > > >   
   > > > Wherever there's intelligent opinions around, there will be things to   
   > > > talk about. But I thought you were complaining about atheists posting   
   > > > in your newsgroups, not making a plea for the inclusion of theist   
   > > > posts in alt.atheism.   
   > >   
   > > Obviously you did not understand. Especially the concept of the thought.   
   >   
   > What's so difficult about the "concept of thought"? Or are you lying   
   > again?   
      
   Is that really the best you can do? Your comment belies your ability to   
   understand. ;)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)