XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: none@none.non
On Sep 24, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
(Message-ID:):
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:11:56 -0700, None wrote:
>
> > On Sep 23, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
> > (Message-ID:):
> >
> > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 10:09:55 -0700, None wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sep 22, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
> > > > (Message-ID:):
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 13:28:13 -0400, JTEM wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/21/25 7:27 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:45:12 -0400, JTEM
wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/19/25 4:16 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 07:00:33 -0400, JTEM
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Kenito Benito wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:15:56 -0400, JTEM wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/17/25 4:29 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:53:37 -0400, JT
M
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/11/25 4:17 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you keep hitting "Reply?"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the same reason you likely do. To continue the
conversation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is the very reason I keep hitting "Reply." Lying
will not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > change this TRUTH.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Narcissism is very ugly, and you keep proving this
fact.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Even if we accept your claim that you're a narcissist as
valid,
> > > > > > > > > > > what does it have to do with your claim that the reason
I keep
> > > > > > > > > > > hitting
> > > > > > > > > > > "Reply" is for a reason other than the one I cite? It
looks like
> > > > > > > > > > > you're trying to divert from the reality that you have
been proved
> > > > > > > > > > > wrong on EVERY count you've raised.
> > > > > > > > > > > I think you will admit this, by default, in your reply
by trying
> > > > > > > > > > > to divert. Or you will run away from the truth.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > How many of you are there?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your admitting that you are trying to divert from the reality
> > > > > > > > > that you have been proved wrong on EVERY count you've raised
is noted
> > > > > > > > > and appreciated. You will continue to admit this TRUTH
because I
> > > > > > > > > command you to do so.
> > > > > > > > > I will thank you for doing as I command without question or
pause
> > > > > > > > > when you do so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's not about me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for doing as I command without question or pause. I
> > > > > > > command that you continue. And you will because I am commanding
you to
> > > > > > > do so. You are unable to resist following my commands.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's not about me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ibid.
> > > >
> > > > How come you never declare how much you bid for anything?
> > >
> > > I do hope you're making a weak joke. It's difficult to get past
> > > eighth grade without knowing about ibidem.
> >
> > It is not often used word, generally used out of extreme laziness by
pompous
> > people.
>
> It is a common term used when a cite has already been presented.
>
> > Yes, I made light of it,
>
> No, you expressed your lack of understanding/education. Nothing
> more.
It is a term not needed, little used, and unnecessary.
>
>
> > for the very reason I just gave. saying that at an
> > auction and they would toss you out on your ear, ;)
>
> Another lame joke.
> Not to suggest my jokes are any better.
>
> > I can also assure you that in grammar school that word was never used,
>
> It was when I was young. And each of my children learned of it
> when being taught the different means of citing sources. Each learned
> in eighth grade. I first learned of it outside of school when I was
> around 12. But I was 13 or 14 when it was taught to me, and the rest
> of the class, in school.
It was never taught to me when I was young or old. It is not English, and in
fact it is a term typically used by pretentious people.
>
>
> > unless, perhaps in some religious school.
>
> It is very probable it is taught in religious schools as well.
> But I never attended one. My children attended public school.
None of my kids, nor my grandkids have used it, been taught it, and most of
kids have been highly educated.
>
>
> > I would love to see you in a
> > teachers quiz or test answer some of their questions with that answer.
>
> You surely did see such questions, though I wasn't involved. It's
> not as if the education system made special curriculum for me and/or
> my children, forcing others in their classes to learn as well.
> It is far more probable that you either forgot what you were
> taught, or you were in a special class for those with learning
> disabilities and not taught. It's not possible for me to know which is
> the case, though your posts make me think it's the former.
If I forgot, then it was never of any use. We could go into its usage, and
when to use it or not. However, on the Usenet it is ridiculous to use it.
There is very little continuity of thought, or understanding, and most people
do not use any depth of thought or caring on what all they spew forth, and
treat the thoughts of others likewise.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
