XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/29/25 6:40 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > Let's assume that you are correct   
      
   Why? Don't you know how to evaluate what I said? Have you no clue   
   what so ever?   
      
   Do you know what Google is? Maybe you just never thought to Google   
   what IS science, or at least forgot to apply what you found to the   
   points I raised here...   
      
   Abiogenesis is true no matter what. It's been tested & falsified   
   since, what? The 1950s? And yet morons BELIEVE no matter what.   
      
   That's religion and NOT science.   
      
   SETI is in the exact same position, though the premise has only   
   been falsified since... when?  The 1960s?   
      
   Paleoanthropology, well, you're not intellectually equipped to   
   even see the issues, but it's never been science. It practically   
   took a crowbar to pry paleo anthropology's grip off of "No   
   interbreeding with Neanderthals," and when it finally happened,   
   thanks to the sequencing of the Neanderthal genome, what changed?   
      
   Absolutely nothing.   
      
   Why did they even need the DNA? Decades earlier they had all the   
   morphological evidence. It actually seemed clear to people who   
   lacked official credentials -- outsiders, yes, and even students   
   studying the material. But only because it was clear, it was   
   obvious....   
      
   But the underlying issue, the one that utterly destroys the   
   claim that paleo anthropology is a science would be the   
   sample/selection bias.   
      
   You are faith based. You BELIEVE stupid things without support,   
   only a religious faith.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)