home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.paranormal      The paranormal and unexplained      34,291 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 33,682 of 34,291   
   JTEM to Mr. Man-wai Chang   
   Re: DNA Proves Humans Are NOT An Acciden   
   14 Oct 25 11:28:40   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/14/25 10:57 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:   
   > On 14/10/2025 10:24 am, JTEM wrote:   
   >>   
   >> It's not DNA. It's how people interpret it, misunderstand it.   
   >>   
   >> For years it was claimed that Neanderthals and so called "Moderns"   
   >> never interbred, and DNA tests were pointed to as proof. But it   
   >> was mtDNA, not nuclear DNA, and other scientific studies operated   
   >> on the exact OPPOSITE assumptions -- that mtDNA can't exclude   
   >> interbreeding. Yes, these two OPPOSING assumptions were promoted   
   >> simultaneously by "Science," and they did so for years.   
      
   > You challenging the theory that Africans' penis and vagina being the one   
   > and only one origin of all human races? :)   
      
   It's vastly more complicated than you are suggesting.   
      
   The biggest error of the mainstream, the status quo, is in pretending   
   that there is one particular spot where modern man landed after falling   
   from the sky.   
      
   The Mungo Man that I've been urging the collective to read up on?  Seems   
   that billions of people walking around right now can trace their   
   ancestry to an Eurasian ancestor that lived long, Long, LONG before any   
   "Mitochondrial Eve."   
      
   A huge issue here, again, is in the interpretation of the DNA   
   "Evidence."   
      
   If nobody carries a particular mtDNA line, according to the status   
   quo, then nobody is descended from that line. But this super old mtDNA   
   from the Eurasian ancestor? A very, Very, VERY long time ago there was   
   a mutation, and this mutation stuck some of it onto the nuclear DNA,   
   on chromosome 11. So there's absolute proof that billions of people do   
   descend from this line, but the way the status quo interprets the DNA   
   excludes it... yet we have proof... yet they exclude it... yet we have   
   proof... and they exclude it anyway.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca