Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 33,682 of 34,291    |
|    JTEM to Mr. Man-wai Chang    |
|    Re: DNA Proves Humans Are NOT An Acciden    |
|    14 Oct 25 11:28:40    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 10/14/25 10:57 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:       > On 14/10/2025 10:24 am, JTEM wrote:       >>       >> It's not DNA. It's how people interpret it, misunderstand it.       >>       >> For years it was claimed that Neanderthals and so called "Moderns"       >> never interbred, and DNA tests were pointed to as proof. But it       >> was mtDNA, not nuclear DNA, and other scientific studies operated       >> on the exact OPPOSITE assumptions -- that mtDNA can't exclude       >> interbreeding. Yes, these two OPPOSING assumptions were promoted       >> simultaneously by "Science," and they did so for years.              > You challenging the theory that Africans' penis and vagina being the one       > and only one origin of all human races? :)              It's vastly more complicated than you are suggesting.              The biggest error of the mainstream, the status quo, is in pretending       that there is one particular spot where modern man landed after falling       from the sky.              The Mungo Man that I've been urging the collective to read up on? Seems       that billions of people walking around right now can trace their       ancestry to an Eurasian ancestor that lived long, Long, LONG before any       "Mitochondrial Eve."              A huge issue here, again, is in the interpretation of the DNA       "Evidence."              If nobody carries a particular mtDNA line, according to the status       quo, then nobody is descended from that line. But this super old mtDNA       from the Eurasian ancestor? A very, Very, VERY long time ago there was       a mutation, and this mutation stuck some of it onto the nuclear DNA,       on chromosome 11. So there's absolute proof that billions of people do       descend from this line, but the way the status quo interprets the DNA       excludes it... yet we have proof... yet they exclude it... yet we have       proof... and they exclude it anyway.                            --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca