XPost: alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/13/2025 10:48 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 11/13/25 10:58 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >> On 11/13/2025 8:05 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>> On 11/13/25 8:37 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Problem is that as our beloved star, the Sun, ages it will get   
   >>>> brighter; someday, there will be no more ice ages:   
   >>>   
   >>> No, no, no, my delectable chocolate morsel of passion. You were   
   >>> supposed to be explaining this imaginary "FEEDBACK" that was   
   >>> going to cause heat to make things freeze.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I already told you this   
   >   
   > No. You babbled incoherently about tsunamis and other nonsense.   
   >   
   >> -- around the same amount of thermal energy exists in the meter of   
   >> seawater at the ocean's surface as the 100 kilometers of air above it.   
   >   
   > There isn't "An" amount, it fluctuates wildly. Where did you get   
   > that claim? I just performed a rather exhaustive 30 second Google   
   > search without finding anything close to confirming it.   
   >   
   > The fact is that most of the sun's energy falls along the equator   
   > and then is redistributed across the globe by the currents. This   
   > is why changes to the ocean currents can spark an ice age -- cold   
   > spots develop.   
   >   
   > Nice France is roughly just as far north as Toronto Canada, yet   
   > averages a December temperature roughly 20F higher...   
   >   
   > Same planet. It's just that the energy is never distributed   
   > uniformly. This is also why Antarctica is so cold, and how you   
   > know all the Gwobull Warbling "Science" is a fraud. They often   
   > claim antartica is warming. But it can't. It froze over when   
   > both temperature & CO2 were much higher. WHY it froze over is   
   > because of the formation of the circumpolar current, which   
   > effectively walls it off from warmer ocean waters traveling   
   > from the equator.   
   >   
   > NONE OF THIS is any explanation for your "FEEDBACK," this   
   > claim that heat will cause everything to freeze.   
   >   
      
   This is what the 100+ climate models that the IPCC uses is trying to   
   understand.  Prior to all of that, though, there was a physical chemist,   
   Svante Arrhenius, a Nobel Laureate, who did the initial calculations.   
   Now, you can look all of this up (very easy) to find out, and, here it is:   
      
   "He calculated that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 would cause a global   
   temperature increase of 5 to 6C."   
      
   Professor Arrhenius did his calculation back in 1896; in your opinion,   
   is this when the "global warming fraud" first began?   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)