XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/20/25 2:31 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
      
   > I'm not discussing science   
      
   I know that. I pointed that out. You're just name-dropping.   
      
   Which is weird, because the name you're dropping is just   
   going along with the garbage narrative that you REFUSE to   
   even think about, merely believe. You know, the narrative   
   that just isn't true.   
      
   > I have no reason to want them to be right.   
      
   You need to be right. You need to be not wrong. And you are   
   wrong.   
      
   Your "Argument" is stupid. You're just repeating what was   
   already defeated, thinking that if you name drop that makes   
   idiocy smart.   
      
   >> Time for you to pick a new handle!   
      
   > You first!   
      
   Lol!  The jillary line, and just as random/inappropriate!   
      
   >> When did your precious Gwobull Warbling start?   
   >   
   > From:   
      
   See? Every handle is the same narcissism.   
      
   Don't "Cite" a source. Tell. You were asked a question. Answer.   
      
   > "1938 - Using records from 147 weather stations around the world,> British   
   engineer Guy Callendar shows that temperatures had risen over   
   > the previous century.   
      
   So you're saying 1838 is the start   
      
   Okay, what were CO2 emissions in 1838?   
      
   >> What were CO2   
   >> levels at that time?   
   >   
   > https://earth.org/data_visualization/a-brief-history-of-co2/   
      
   Nope. Didn't see any number for 1838. Why don't you copy & paste   
   the figure from your "Cite?"   
      
   Come on, put on your Big Boy pants and do this:  What were CO2   
   emissions in 1838?   
      
   Why is this important? BECAUSE THIS TELLS YOU HOW MUCH OUR   
   PRESENT EMISSIONS NEED TO BE CUT TO STOP YOUR GWOBULL WARBLING   
   MYTH!   
      
   What was the population of the planet earth back in 1838?   
      
   What is it now?   
      
   Humans exhale CO2. Subtract the population of 1838 from the present,   
   to see how many extra people are exhaling CO2 now.   
      
   How does that compare to human "Industrial" emissions in 1838?   
      
   Can you work it out, sweet lips, because I promise you that you'll   
   be surprised.   
      
   What are China's emissions right now? Just China. Any clue?   
      
   Google it. Compare that figure to emissions in your 1838.   
      
   The point, of course, is that your narrative is retarded. It's not   
   just stupid, it's retarded. It is literally impossible for anything   
   ever proposed to achieve the stated goals.   
      
   AND, it has never ever even been established that a warmer earth   
   would be a bad thing, much less that any supposed warming is beyond   
   the natural variation.   
      
   IT'S A HOAX!   
      
   You believe in a hoax. Maybe at one time it was well intentioned,   
   as good or better reason as any to push conservation, but it's   
   been completely highjacked by the most greedy, evil, power hungry   
   pieces of shit on earth. And here you are, lapping at their assholes,   
   trying to tongue every wrinkle clean...   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)