XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/10/2025 12:19 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 12/8/2025 11:18 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   >>> There are noises. People do feel cold spots. There are   
   >>> EMFs detected. EVPs are recorded. Multiple witnesses do   
   >>> report the same sighting... on & on.   
   >>>   
   >>> The experiences are real and in countless cases external   
   >>> in origins. All I'm saying is that there's more than one   
   >>> explanation.   
   >>>   
   >>> More than two explanations.   
   >   
   >> Simple.  There are no ghosts.   
   >   
   > wow gosh the stereotypical reaction of a narcissist i am so   
   > surprised maybe shocked oh yes i am shocked oh my oh my what   
   > a surprise...   
   >   
   > The topic wasn't whether or not ghosts are real or what people   
   > were actually experiencing. You don't know this because you're   
   > an idiot.   
   >   
   > Okay, back to what I was saying:  People describe many different   
   > things and call them all "Ghosts." Why? Why are they all under   
   > the same umbrella term? If people offered such wildly different   
   > descriptions for "an" animal, we'd all assume that they were   
   > seeing different animals. So why do we throw away the rules for   
   > "Ghosts?"   
   >   
      
   Because animals poop; ghosts do not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)