XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:24:31 -0600, Dawn Flood   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Yeppers!  I can't derive the   
   >>   
   >> So you're pretending to address... what?   
   >>   
   >> I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never   
   >> going to.   
   >>   
   >> YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience   
   >> time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're   
   >> pretending to refute what I say... idiot.   
   >>   
   >> We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present   
   >> and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This   
   >> is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of   
   >> Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."   
   >>   
   >> This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes   
   >> but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described   
   >> it.   
   >>   
   >> "He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"   
   >>   
   >> Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh   
   >> at you over it later.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> NOTE:  Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening"   
   >> thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed   
   >> Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective   
   >> both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another   
   >> perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH   
   >> PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid   
   >> people can't wrap your head around.   
   >   
   >No, no, and no!!  The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only   
   >relates to events that are acausal.  If one event causes another event,   
   >then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event   
   >A' came *before* 'Event B'.   
   >   
   >Do you understand this??   
      
        John probably doesn't understand. He has claimed he's not yet 10   
   years of age, so he isn't too likely to have been taught. But he   
   doesn't care.   
        Being right has NEVER been his goal. Simply using 'argumentum ad   
   hominem' seems to be his only motive and goal.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)