XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:12:36 -0500, JTEM  wrote:   
      
   >On 12/12/25 4:36 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >>On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:24:31 -0600, Dawn Flood   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Yeppers!  I can't derive the   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So you're pretending to address... what?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never   
   >>>> going to.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience   
   >>>> time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're   
   >>>> pretending to refute what I say... idiot.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present   
   >>>> and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This   
   >>>> is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of   
   >>>> Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes   
   >>>> but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described   
   >>>> it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh   
   >>>> at you over it later.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> NOTE:  Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening"   
   >>>> thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed   
   >>>> Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective   
   >>>> both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another   
   >>>> perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH   
   >>>> PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid   
   >>>> people can't wrap your head around.   
   >>>   
   >>>No, no, and no!!  The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only   
   >>>relates to events that are acausal.  If one event causes another event,   
   >>>then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event   
   >>>A' came *before* 'Event B'.   
   >>>   
   >>>Do you understand this??   
   >>   
   >>     John probably doesn't understand. He has claimed he's not yet 10   
   >>years of age, so he isn't too likely to have been taught. But he   
   >>doesn't care.   
   >>     Being right has NEVER been his goal. Simply using 'argumentum ad   
   >>hominem' seems to be his only motive and goal.   
   >   
   >It's a discussion group, you demented twat.   
      
        Thank you for proving me 100% correct. You are dismissed.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)