XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: soc.history.ancient   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 1/26/26 12:13 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/26/26 1:54 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >   
   >> again, i didn't even post a model, i posted observations ...   
   >   
   > Which, other than as an example of your narcissism, isn't   
   > the least bit interesting.   
      
   i'm sorry the clear trend in ice volume loss isn't the least bit   
   interesting???   
      
   my god u must be a boring person, lol   
      
   >   
   > The Holocene is popularly dated back maybe 12,000 years but   
   > when factoring out the Younger Dryas cooling, it's really   
   > closer to 15,000 years old. And your "Observations," pretending   
   > that you could be accurate, would go back... only 2,000 years?   
   >   
   > Only a pathetic 1,000 years?   
   >   
   > Wait. Could your "Observations" be over nothing more than a   
   > few century during a 15,000 year old period?   
   >   
   > Not even that?   
   >   
   > Seek help.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)