Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,551 of 170,335    |
|    Dim Witte to Dim Witte    |
|    Re: political philosophies    |
|    02 Aug 23 04:39:17    |
      From: dakadldo2@gmail.com              On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-8, Dim Witte wrote:       > What with the world evolving collectively now, must be we be aware of       several political philosophies, at least in general. Probably true that each       major political system has within in variations, if only because man must       muster understanding in local        ways.        >        > U.S. is a good example of politics and political parties shaping up, with       more than one philosophy assumed to be at odds.        >        > Supposedly, U.S. is a republican democracy, as I understand it, practicing       and defending democracy in many ways, based on a written constitution defended       by a supreme court, and a republic for providing peoples representatives.        >        > Other countries that like to be counted as democracies, like Sweden, Norway,       Finland, Denmark, are known to be socialist, with private enterprise managed       by central government. Even Russia has said it's a democracy for the way its       central communist        party represents the people. Other countries, too, like Taiwan and even China       to some extent show respect for democratic institutions, evidently.        >        > Then there is state socialism, where the state manages it all in a sort of       totalitarianism of controlling all industries and services. We assume China,       North Korea, Cuba, and other socialist countries are bent toward state       socialism.        >        > I'm talking off the top of my head about political philosophies, without       real knowledge enough to even characterize well how world cultures are shaping       up. It does seem as though even the U.S. will develop more socialism than it       already has in terms of        government programs and agency oversight. No doubt Medicare and Medicaid will       evolve into something better than we have now, and many would like something       like what Canada has.        >        > More federal government and less state government seems to be the direction       we're going, when you look at all the leftist political movements celebrated       by news media. In terms of government vs. chaos, U.S. is showing more chaos       every day at national,        state, and city levels. Not sure what the digital age brings upon us.        >        > Question, too, is whether nations like in Africa and South America are       unable to become democratic republics and might benefit from socialist       governments. Evidently both Russia and China are making moves that way.       ------------              Evidently no good assuming that the ancient idea of political philosophy can't       be described in terms of thesis-antithesis-synthesis, as in Hegels description       of it, because of the assumption that inevitably this proceeds to an ideal       state must be wrong,        since change is in the nature of all. So where does this leave communism and       its stages? Not sure whether Russia wants to go back to a "soviet union" with       all the old block states. Not sure if China sees its social reforms leading       to an ideal state        either, beyond reintegrating Hong Kong and Taiwan.              Perhaps such speculation about how the world is shaping up at least allows       some pragmatic adjustments, not all-out military invasion--occupation--regime       change as the U.S. did in the Middle East.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca