Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,735 of 170,335    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    Tyrannical family arrangements and democ    |
|    18 Oct 23 21:00:15    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              There are many proponents of tyrannical parenting who think that they are       doing their country a favour by doing what they do.              They are not. Tyrannical parenting fails to adequately prepare people for       living in a democracy.              When raised in households where one person makes all the decisions, people do       not learn compromise and negotiation. The only situations in which they do is       if they’ve seen their parents work through their differences like adults.       And this happens in        households in which the parents are equals.              Authoritarian parenting prepares people for authoritarian politics. So that       even when afforded the rights and liberties of a democracy, a person raised in       authoritarian parenting favours authoritarianism with his vote. We see this       with many people in        America voting for people such as Reagan and Bush and the people in Iran       supporting the Ayatollah. If raised in authoritarianism, people will vote for       authoritarians. And the mechanisms of democracy will be subverted to support       authoritarian politics.              People living in a democracy need to be made prepared for the democracy; and       that means they will have to learn compromise and negotiation. These skills       must be instilled since an early age. Which means that the democratic       household arrangement, in which        the male and the female wield equal power and work with one another like       adults, is the correct household model in which to raise people for a       democracy. They will see their parents practicing compromise and negotiation       with one another. Which means that        they will know how to do the same thing with people in their lives and in       their political activities.              When my ex-wife’s father was telling her that she should listen to me as a       man, I told him that I didn’t believe anything so stupid. He told me that I       was stupid and arrogant. I am a Christian, but I believe that this particular       Christian teaching is        wrong. Once again, if one parent makes all the decisions, the children never       learn compromise and negotiation. Which means that they are ill prepared for a       democracy.              Preparing people for a democracy should start at an early age. Children need       to learn compromise and negotiation. And they will do so, once again, if they       see their parents do that with one another, instead of growing up in       tyrannical households in which        one person’s word is the law.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca