Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,783 of 170,348    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    The Fooled Generation    |
|    02 Nov 23 22:04:13    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              My generation can be called the Fooled Generation. Every sentiment that is       natural to young people had been steered into precisely the wrong direction       when I was young.              The anti-establishment sentiment has been steered into attacks against the       Clinton Administration and against "statism" and "socialism." There is no       statism in America. Soviet Union had statism; America does not. The real       offenders in America are not        public, they are private. Groups like the Church of Scientology and Jehovah's       Witnesses; corrupt networks in law and medicine; corporate criminals - whether       overt criminals like Enron or corrupt oil companies that tell people a load of       lies in order to        keep them hooked on destructive technologies; gangs and the organized crime;       and the men who like to rape their children and beat their wives; are the true       offenders in this country. The government is elected, official, accountable,       checked and balanced.        These entities are no such thing. And this allows them to get away with       greater abuses than what is allowed the American government.              The radical anti-Western civilization sentiment was also steered into       precisely the wrong direction. It was turned into attacks on the Western       Romantic literary and intellectual tradition. In this was attacked the       greatest artwork and literature that has        come out of the Western civilization. Also attacked were the best       relationships. My generation through this was denied the experience of its       youth.              The feminist sentiment was steered into attacks on beauty and love. A claim       was made that such things were patriarchial, degrading to women or destructive       toward their self-esteem. There are many reasons why this is wrong. First,       women are more        naturally gifted with beauty than are men, and denying them the right to       beauty destroys an area of their superiority, putting them at a disadvantage.       Secondly, there are many things - such as money and intelligence - that can be       used to destroy people's        self-esteem that are in no way bad themselves. That some people get D's does       not mean that nobody can get A's, and that some people are poor does not mean       that nobody can be wealthy. Anything with appeal to people will see some       people using it for wrong.        This does not damn what has the appeal; it damns the people who use it for       wrong. Further, many of the people who championed beauty and love - both in       the West and elsewhere - were women, and not stupid or weak ones either. We       see this with everyone from        Sappho to Murabai to Elizabeth Barrett Browning to Dorothy Parker to Anna       Akhmatova to Ayn Rand. Finally, women being robbed of beauty is more, not       less, oppressive to women than women being encouraged to be beautiful. There       are plenty of independent-       minded people - especially in places like Sweden, where feminism is more       advanced than it is in the United States - who willfully choose to be       attractive - and not out of any kind of insecurity or patriarchy but out of       good taste and as an expression of        who they are as women.              The anti-religious sentiment has been steered into an abomination known as       skepticisim: Malicious attacks against anyone reporting spiritual experiences       or taking part in spiritual practice. According to these people, the bulk of       humanity is stupid or        insane. I have news for these people. There are many people much smarter than       they are, who are neither on drugs nor schizophrenic, who have had real       spiritual experiences; and there are many others who have very good reasons       for believing what they        believe. The skeptics think that they are the only sane and intelligent people       on the planet. Some even regard spirituality and religion to be narcissism. I       can think of no more narcissistic, arrogant or - yes - stupid stance than       their own.              And of course the anti-older people sentiment has been steered into attacks on       "the 60s generation" - the generation that started out seeing what was wrong       with the world and sought to correct these wrongs.              My generation has been the Fooled Generation. And while many are perfectly       comfortable with that state of affairs, I for one am not.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca