Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,868 of 170,335    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    Art, Supply and Demand    |
|    09 Dec 23 21:30:15    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              One claim made to discourage people from pursuing a career in the arts is that       artists can’t make a living. That is not always true. I have known artists       who could make a living with their art.              The real problem on this matter is as follows. The supply exceeds the demand.       There are many people who want to be artists; there are not enough people who       want to procure art.              The correct solution to this problem is to increase the demand for art. It is       to get more people to see value in art. Then more people will be buying art,       and more artists will be able to make a living.              Artistic types are constantly accused of a lack of realism. What people who       think such things don’t understand is that the reality of the civilization       is that it is what people make it out to be. Art becomes a part of reality       when more people value and        procure art. And that does not only benefit the artist. It benefits the       civilization and its inhabitants.              In the times to which we look back most fondly, there was both economic boom       and a cultural blossoming. We see this with Renaissance Italy. We see this       with 1920s United States. These times are cherished because they made the most       of man. Business and        technology vitalizes man’s productive potential; culture vitalizes man’s       creative potential. With these liberated to do their job of benefiting the       world, we see created a golden era.              More people need to understand such things. There are many who militate       against, and crush, the creative people. This is a horrible way to behave.       These people need to leave the creative people alone and let them proceed with       their work of making        cultural contributions. That way what they have to offer will be realized, and       people, country and civilization will benefit from it.              Both business and culture constitute accomplishment. Both therefore deserve       respect. Some see artists as narcissistic bums; in fact producing good art       takes hard work. I’ve worked most of my life. I also translated a vast body       of poetry by Russian        poets into English and have original ideas on a range of subjects. There is no       contradiction between art and reality. Art becomes a part of reality when real       people make it so.              Of course a part of the problem is owed to artists themselves. They created       bad styles such as avant garde and postmodernism, and their art fails to speak       to the people. However I have known magnificent artists who took an       oppositional stance to that        state of affairs while producing amazing artwork. These people, not NEA,       should be in the business of running the culture.              When I attended a poetry reading in Melbourne, people were thanking me for       bringing passion back into poetry. Passion – and beauty – is what poetry       is meant to be about. You lose that, you lose the poetic perspective, you       cease being a poet. I have        taken a different route.              So no, there is nothing unrealistic about art. It becomes realistic when       social reality accepts it. More people need to be made convinced of value in       the arts. I am doing my part toward that outcome. I hope that others do as       well.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca