Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,877 of 170,335    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    Empiricism and Kant    |
|    13 Dec 23 19:12:55    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              The empiricist approach to discerning reality is making sense of evidence that       has been gleaned from the senses. Some philosophers – such as Kant –       challenged this approach. They stated such things as that senses are       imprecise, and that (in Kant)        they only see the appearance of things – the “phenomenal” - but fail to       see the things in themselves – the “noumenal.”              I want to make sense of the whole thing.              Now the senses are actually not imprecise. Incomplete yes, but imprecise no.       We do not see the radio waves or the infrared radiation; we see the visible       light. However the information that I get from seeing the visible light is not       an erroneous one. If I        see you, I am certain that I am actually seeing you – both the phenomenal       you and the noumenal you. I can from this be certain that you are not Adolf       Hitler.              In many cases, the things as they appear are very much the things as they are.       If I am beholding an apple, I can be sure that I am holding an apple and not a       frog. In this case the noumenal and the phenomenal are the same thing; and       senses very much are        a valid guide to reality.              Where Kant does have a point is in understanding people. People are very       different inside from how they are on the outside. What a person looks like       through the visual sense says absolutely nothing about the person's character       or predispositions. In case        of people, the Kantian argument has quite a lot of validity. To understand the       person in-himself takes much different skills from discerning him in       appearance. In this situation, the noumenal and the phenomenal very much       differ from one another; and it        takes different skills to understand each.              The empiricist view works with most of non-human reality. With human reality,       Kant has a point. Do not discard physics or mathematics because of its       empiricist origins. Do not judge what a person is on the inside from what he       is on the outside. There is        a place for both approaches, and it is instructive of all intelligence to       recognize which – and where – to apply.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca