Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,882 of 170,335    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    Traumatization and Sex    |
|    16 Dec 23 01:11:09    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              There are people endorsing hysterically prudish attitudes by saying that many       people get traumatized through sex.              That some people get traumatized through sex no more damns sex than that some       people get traumatized through family damn family.              There are all sorts of ways in which people can get traumatized. People get       traumatized in war. People get traumatized in bad upbringing. People get       traumatized when their families get shot or their countries get destroyed. Sex       is one of the many things        that can go wrong. Sex abuse victims don’t own traumatization.              You want to trauma-d*cksize? I will win. I had the whole world that I came       from completely destroyed. I had a hideous home situation. I was taken to an       alien country where people treated me like dirt regardless of how much effort       I put into things. I had        a woman whom I loved, whose stepmother manipulated her against me. I have been       relentlessly and viciously persecuted for years on end by people accusing me       of a crime I did not commit. In none of these cases did it have anything to do       with sex.              So I had a friend tell me that we don’t rehabilitate sex offenders. Why on       earth not? Socrates was a sex offender. He liked little boys. Mohammad was a       sex offender. He had sex with a 9-year-old child. Thomas Jefferson was a sex       offender. He had        children by a teenage slave. If someone is guilty of a sex crime, he is just       that: someone guilty of a crime. He is not an animal, he is not subhuman, and       he is not damned for life.              I want to see these matters dealt with in a sane and humane manner. Clearly we       cannot have people raping children or giving Rohypnol to college girls; but       neither can we have witch hunts and demonization.              Right now, we see some people so convinced of their goodness, yet they treat a       section of the population as less than human. By taking that stance they       become worse people themselves. When we treat someone as less than human that       also dehumanizes us.        That is even the case with people who are genuinely bad.              At the heart is not who sex offenders are as people. It is who we are as       people. Are we the kind of people who run witch hunts? Are we the kind of       people who dehumanize others? Are we the kind of people who relentlessly       persecute people we do not know?        Or are we – and our countries – better than that?              Do we let sex offenders off? Not at all. We prosecute sex crime like any other       crime. However we don’t dehumanize these people. As for sex, it is important       to correct hysterical thinking about it. Sex is just one of the many things       that can be used for        wrong ends. That does not make it bad in itself.              Ilya Shambat       https://sites.google.com/site/ilyashambatthought              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca