Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 168,898 of 170,335    |
|    D to Ilya Shambat    |
|    Re: Philosophy and the working man    |
|    21 Dec 23 10:51:04    |
      From: nospam@example.net               This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,        while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.              On Wed, 20 Dec 2023, Ilya Shambat wrote:              > in his natural form. The natural form of social organization is the       > hunter-gatherer tribe. The worker exists because the civilization              What is "natural"? Not sure I agree without some additional definition.              > these people would have very little of what they have. It takes       > intellectuals to conceptualize and justify things such as capitalism.              The fact that it does take intellectuals and economists to justify       capitalism means that something is very wrong with the world and the       education of the people. In order to justify capitalism, nothing more       should be required than looking around you and comparing that view with       the view in a history book from 100 years ago. Every metric is better.              > philosopher who is firmly in support of capitalism. And capitalism       > gained greatly from her efforts.              My feeling, living in europe, is that most states are moving away from       capitalism and democracy and many people are doing their best to villify       Ayn Rand.              > solvable one. It is possible to support both endeavors. Culture is not       > for “snobs” or “liberal elites.” Many of the best cultural              How do you think culture became the domain of the left? I always       wondered. Education, culture, etc. always the domain of the left.              > outlook. As for myself, I’ve written an essay deconstructing Communism       > and have written in favor of business. I am not a Communist. I am       > however willing to look at the reasons why there was Communism and see       > the correct changes made to keep the same thing from happening again.              Interesting. I always thought communisms rise is built on the religious       reflex, except, that the leaders promise heaven on earth _right now_. Of       course economics has explained to us why communism can never work, and       every time it fails the leaders proclaim "ahh... but it was not done       right that time". ;)              > Neither the businessman nor the artist are good or bad. Both are       > capable of both. There are potentials for abuses in any endeavor. I              Yes, even communists are capable of evil.              Best regards,        Daniel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca