home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.philosophy      Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?      170,335 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 168,938 of 170,335   
   Arindam Banerjee to All   
   The Jewish stranglehold over physics   
   02 Feb 24 08:50:31   
   
   From: banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com   
      
   > >> But I've digressed. The important bit is that Arindam must have   
   > >> studied special relativity as an engineering undergraduate.   
      
   I studied that in high school, and found it to be the least convincing of   
   anything that had been taught to me in science.   
      
   Fortunately, I was never taught the relativity nonsense in my physics class in   
   my IIT, but I did have to do a compulsory course in quantum mechanics - a most   
   useless course, just showed what brilliant liars there be - and there was some   
   talk of e=mcc    
   there. I passed it of course, swallowing all that nonsense and writing what   
   was expected to be written for answers in the tests.   
      
   However such was the propaganda by the Jews et al about this relativity e=mcc   
   nonsense, I must admit i was brainwashed, as much as the rest.   
      
   Not until I was around 43 or so, and had derived the formula m=0.5mVVN(N-k) as   
   an alternative to e=mcc, did I think it was wrong.   
   Then the more I came to know about it, thanks to social media which quoted   
   Tesla on relativity, the more I came to know how much the whole world had been   
   conned - or should I say, jewed! With Jewish physics, pure nonsense that is   
   now the most hallowed    
   wisdom.   
   In 2005 I found the great bungle in the MMI expt which actually shows that the   
   speed of light is variant with the speed of emitter. That by itself outs SR.   
      
   The Doppler effect clearly shows that light speed varies with the speed of the   
   emitter. The wavelength simply cannot change, but moves faster or slower   
   depending upon the speed of light, and that creates higher or lower   
   frequencies.   
      
   GR is a joke. There the eclipse merely showed optical lensing, but propaganda   
   and lies made it gravitational lensing!   
      
      
   As Tesla put it, the proponents of relativity are not scientists but   
   theologians. I say, they are simply crooks who have "made" the whole universe   
   crooked with "space-time warping".   
      
   Hubble and Webb show no end to the universe, nor distant galaxies flying out   
   at extraordinary speeds as they are supposed to.   
      
   It is an infinite, eternal, Newtonian universe where energy most obviously is   
   always created and destroyed. The silly laws of thermodynamics are at best   
   outdated. Heat engines are on the way out. Free energy, renewable energy, etc.   
   are in. alibaba.com    
   sells free energy engines (using permanent magnets), say $10000 for 10KW. Even   
   fatheads chanting e=mcc cannot deny that solar, geo, wind, hydro etc. have   
   free energy sources but are called renewable sources instead!   
      
      
   >>> His   
   > >> rejection of it must be by nuttiness rather than ignorance.   
      
   True I am not one of the pullulating piddling pedagogues peddling porkies like   
   e=mcc to gullible kids.   
   I admire Tesla, who did so much, and not mediocre and pretentious academic   
   bullshitters.   
      
   > > It's his faith in perpetual motion that cost him his credibility with   
   > > me. (It's true he does go on a bit, which is a sort of perpetual   
   > > motion, I suppose.) I'd missed his views on relativity - perhaps   
   > > because he's in my killfile.   
      
   The whole universe is in perpetual motion.   
   The Earth, the Sun, the galaxies... all are in perpetual motion.   
   The electrons spin around the nuclei of atoms perpetually.   
   What is so strange about believing in perpetual motion, and why killfile me   
   for that, unless you are some simple-minded bigot stewed in racism?   
   In which case, if you are a simple-minded bigot stewed in racism, your   
   killfile is where I want to be.   
      
   > The two things are linked. He claims that Einstein's E=mc^2 is wrong,   
   > and produces an alternative formula. As a side-effect, conservation of   
   > mass-energy is violated in his theory, which means that you can get free   
   > energy from nowhere.   
      
   We get free energy from everywhere. The plants get free energy from the Sun   
   and the Earth. We get free energy from wind and sun and water. Okay we have to   
   pay for installing solar cells, but so far even Mr Bill Gates has not managed   
   to charge me for    
   getting warmed up by the Sun. Or for the wind drying clothes on a clothesline.   
      
   Anyway my main point is that with the violation of inertia, the whole of   
   physics gets revised. When you have a motor that can make a body accelerate   
   indefinitely, you can go to the stars in that, going faster than light. So   
   much I worked out in 1998-99    
   and presented in my book "To the Stars!" in 2000.   
      
   Yes, we are getting free energy from nowhere, as I have explained in detail in   
   my physics essays on gravity, cause of stellar energy, nova and supernova   
   phenomena, etc.   
      
      
   > I've never had the patience to go through the details. I suspect that   
   > his theory also implies that Newton was wrong, although he probably   
   > hasn't noticed that.   
      
   I never said that Newton was wrong. Newton had no clue about electricity.   
   I have updated Newtonian laws with the discovery of electricity.   
   It is the Arindam-Newton laws of motion that will take us to the stars.   
      
   V=nv   
   e=0.5mVVN(N-k)   
   c(v)=c+v   
      
   Newton was actually corrupted by later physicists, who introduced the term   
   "external" in the First Law.   
   I removed it; a body can be moved by internal force, as I have demonstrated in   
   my rail gun experiments.   
      
   > Every so often I'm tempted to remove him from my killfile, because in   
   > some ways he's a good comedy act.   
      
   Better not, your conditioning may get affected.   
   It has been said, the lie that exalts us is dearer than ten thousand truths.   
   Remain exalted thus, with the global chanting of e=mcc to please the powers   
   above.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca