From: oldernow@dev.null
On 2024-02-07, Truthslave wrote:
> Analysis you say.
>
> All i see are more buttons being pushing. A confused
> quest to find those who blindly agrees, and those who
> question meaning.
I've no argument with what other see, i.e. believe.
> If there were analysis, there would first be an agreement
> on what exactly was being Analyzed.
Sure. Per some points of view. Other points of view of what
constitutes analysis might be less rigorous. And then sometimes
people are just trying to have some word fun they consider clever.
So........
> I see a label changing with the times.
> A label as a banner or black flag, a rallying cry,
> to mean any thing, or all things, everything and nothing.
How could it be otherwise given meaning seems confined to specific
conceptuality contexts sometimes referred to as individual minds?
> I see the sound passed from one generation to the next,
> and our managed reflexes. Whatever it once meant, has long
> since passed on, into the relm of nonsense.
In some conceptuality contexts - aka minds - but not others.
> Without a clear idea , all we are left with is dissonance
> and the controls found there.
They're all clear in specific minds. The seeming dissonance is
created by insisting there's some common, objective meaning to
words. Next to nothing in my life experience supports that belief.
I can't even make it through a couple, three consecutive days without
my wife and I at odds over what is in fact mutual pretense that words
contain meaning, when in fact we endow them with private meaning.
Which, of course, renders this transmission attempt - not to mention
its author - pretty silly.... ;-)
--
oldernow
xyz001 at nym.hush.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
