Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 169,006 of 170,335    |
|    Ilya Shambat to All    |
|    Principled Loyalty    |
|    17 Feb 24 10:54:56    |
      From: ibshambat@gmail.com              Some people's concept of ethics is based on the concept of loyalty, and other       people's concept of ethics is based on the concept of principle. Neither       however is adequate in itself. I combine the two to come up with a more       workable concept: Principled        Loyalty.              Loyalty, by itself, creates things such as the mafia. Mafia has strong       internal loyalties, but it treats everyone else like dirt. I do not want to       see the world being run by mafia values.              Principle, by itself, lacks realism and compassion. Principle wants to treat       everyone equally. I do not believe that that is a fair expectation. People       will have loyalties to one another. People will prefer their own over others.       People will prefer their        children over other people's children, and people will prefer their countries       over other countries. I consider it foolishness to expect anything else.              I combine the two to create something better than either: Principled Loyalty.              Principled loyalty seeks the well-being of people to whom one is loyal, but it       refuses to do wrong things for them. Specifically, it refuses to do wrong to       others. If my country wanted me to throw sulfuric acid into the face of a       child, I would not do it.        If someone to whom I am personally loyal wanted me to commit murder, I would       not do it. Instead I will look for workable ways to advance their best       interest without hurting others.              Principled loyalty therefore corrects the potential for error in both loyalty       and principle and then combines the two to create something better than either       side.              One thing that happens when cultures mix is people's conception of ethics       getting taken away from them. I used to have a strong ethical system that was       based in Communism. When I came to America, that got deconstructed, and I was       left without moral        guidance. I have had to use my mind and my experiences to create a more       informed system of ethics. Principled loyalty is what I came up with as a       result.              With principled loyalty, we see both human reality and values at work. People       will have loyalties to one another, but unconditional loyalty takes people       into the mafia land. Principle is very much a virtue, but by itself it fails       to consider human        reality. There is a need for both. With principled loyalty, people will       advance the lot of their own without hurting others in the process.              I will prefer my own over others, and I do not expect anyone else to act       differently. I will not however do wrong things for them. I will look at how       to advance their interests without hurting others. Doing that corrects the       potential for error in both        loyalty and principle. And the result is a more functional system of ethics       â€“ one that considers both human reality and principle and gives people a       workable way to advance the interests of their own without hurting others.              Ilya Shambat        https://sites.google.com/site/ilyashambatthought              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca