From: oldernow@dev.null   
      
   AI must fail because its overall ecosystem promotes information   
   incest.   
      
   What began with input from genuinely intelligent beings describing   
   their experiences as biological beings is processed in accord   
   with "statistical large language analysis" algorithms, and   
   ejaculated/vomited/shitted back into the same information pond,   
   *necessarily* being less valuable that that acquired from the   
   previous information gathering round for not being rooted in actual,   
   biological living experience.   
      
   Subsequent mining of information from that pond implies gathering   
   "information" *increasingly* less based upon the experience of   
   actually living.   
      
   At this point one would normally write "rinse and repeat", except   
   in this case the "rinse" is actually a dirtying.   
      
   My statistical analysis has concluded that the chance of the ultimate   
   result being other than information birth defects giving rise to   
   even more information birth defects - again, from the perspective   
   of actual, biological living beings - is precisely zero.   
      
   --   
   oldernow   
   xyz001 at nym.hush.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)