From: oldernow@dev.null
On 2024-04-15, D wrote:
> Orgmode is one of those mysteries to me. Everyone I
> know who "does it" loves it. Organization is one of my
> weak spots where I resort to web based calendars of what
> ever taste (google, microsoft) the company I work for at
> the moment likes. It does pain me, and I have a one way
> integrator between google calendar and remind + wyrd for
> some nice text mode calendaring, but haven't found the
> energy to integrate meeting invitations.
>
> My default for oganizing meetings and to dos is a
> combination of textfiles with dates in them ? la (20240415
> to get them in the right order in the terminal) and maybe
> a physical note book if it is super important or if I feel
> the need to activat the physical writing brain center for
> some task by doodling/making non-linear notes.
>
> But yes, orgmode is one of those things I constantly have
> on my list to check out more in depth. I think I saw
> orgmode fro vim, but don't remember, but I wouldn't be
> surprised if someone wrote it for vim as well.
I've the best excuse to not attempt to get with orgmode
*EVAR*! I'm not going to live long enough to figure out
how to install emacs, learn even a smattering of essential
keystrokes, and then learn orgmode.... :-)
It is kind of weird to have it increasingly in the back of
the head that death very well could intervene on my behalf
with respect to tyrannical friggin' todo list contents....
But even short of that extreme case, I very frequently
agree to do things that the wife comes up with, knowing she
so frequently changes her mind, and life so frequently
changes the plan, that there's almost always a well
above 50% chance I won't actually have to go through
with whatever it is. I take a *lot* of comfort in that,
and get to be the good guy by assenting to boot!
--
oldernow
xyz001 at nym.hush.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
