From: nospam@example.net   
      
     This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,   
     while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.   
      
   On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, oldernow wrote:   
      
   > On 2024-04-24, D  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> True. We are literally trying to argue _from_ the I   
   >>>> to convey an experience _without_ the I. On the other   
   >>>> side, the person is using his I to understand what's it   
   >>>> like without an I. Conceptually that's pretty close to   
   >>>> impossible, if not impossible. Only direct experience,   
   >>>> without the intermediary layer of words and thought,   
   >>>> will convey it fully.   
   >>>   
   >>>         *** O... M... F... G...! ***   
   >>>   
   >>>    
   >>>   
   >>> This is the first time this here seeming instance of   
   >>> individuality has read someone he was interacting with   
   >>> (as opposed to "reading it in a book") state such,   
   >>> especially so clearly and on the money....   
   >>>   
   >>> This simulation we're defined in is getting danged   
   >>> interesting, indeed!   
   >>   
   >> Ahh... glad I could be of service. Every once in a while   
   >> we might stumble on some grains of wisdom here. ;)   
   >   
   > I'm good at nothing if not stumbling!   
   >   
   >> I think the above was inspired by a bit of Kant and a bit   
   >> of Jaspers with a pinch of my own thoughts and words. I   
   >> think I'll stick it in the book!  ;)   
   >   
   > I'm already thinking you need a sequel. ;-)   
      
   Well, I guess once the ball has started to roll, I could perhaps launch   
   myself as the new self-help guru par excellence á la deepak chopra! ;)   
   Should be a few dollars in it I hope. ;)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)