Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 169,403 of 170,335    |
|    D to oldernow    |
|    Re: Perhaps we need to make knowledge di    |
|    11 May 24 21:25:06    |
      From: nospam@example.net              On Sat, 11 May 2024, oldernow wrote:              > In the spirit of these:       >       > https://tilde.club/~oldernow/2024-05-10-20-24-05-perhaps-pure-       ext-is-the-best-walled-garden-of-all.txt       > https://tilde.club/~oldernow/2024-05-10-20-57-39-the-textonly-revolution.txt       >       > it hit me that while people have become wisely concerned       > with the effect of "infinite scroll" on our psyche, their       > faith in what is arguably the cornerstone of "the web"       > prevents them from seeing that hypertext links aren't too       > different than infinite scroll: they're infinite click.       >       > Mr. Berners-Lee no doubt had the best of intentions, but       > simply clicking to travel between collections of thoughts       > is, well, *too* simple for animals whose growth is in       > large part dependent on making efforts.       >       > Whereas knowledge is one thing, *hard fought* knowledge       > is at least an order of magnitude more.       >       > So while I don't doubt increasing collective concerns       > about links from a trust-ability point of view, I think       > the bigger concern is how the ease of navigation between       > collections of thoughts undermines their value.       >       > In that context, I've decided to no longer create hypertext       > links. In fact, I want to be as done with hypertext in       > general as is possible without throwing any babies out       > with it.       >       > I don't want readers who arrive by way of a click, and       > who are primarily focused on presentation. If they can't       > do as much as copy and paste a link, they're likely too       > stupid to understand what I'm saying anyway.              Oh got it! I thought for a moment you were done with links altogether! ;)       Cutting and pasting a link, I think I might be able to do that. ;)              > Similarly, I don't want readers who will only read my       > screed if/when it looks pretty. Goodbye, Superficial       > Suzies!              Perhaps choosing your readers is as much good advice as the eternal       business advice of choosing your customers?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca