XPost: alt.philosophy.debate   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   *Truthmaker Maximalism defended*   
   https://philarchive.org/archive/RODTMD   
      
   *Truthmaker Maximalism defended again*   
   https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/51136/CONICET_D   
   gital_Nro.1bfa0f9c-c095-4df6-be4e-11272f48f965_A.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y   
      
      
   We can define truthmaker in such a way that Truthmaker Maximalism may   
   become irrefutable:   
      
   When an expression of language X lacks any possible way under the Sun to   
   show that it is true thenn (then and only then) does X actually lack a   
   truthmaker. When the same thing applies to ~X then we know that X is not   
   a truth-bearer.   
      
   We can know that Goldbach's conjecture is either true or false yet this   
   might require an infinite sequence of steps thus may be where truth   
   diverges from knowledge.   
      
   *Goldbach's conjecture*   
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach%27s_conjecture   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)