From: x@x.org   
      
   On 7/8/24 13:35, D wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > On Mon, 8 Jul 2024, Richmond wrote:   
   >   
   >> "W. Greenhouse"  writes:   
   >>   
   >>> D  writes:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Found this article and thought that you might be interested. What will   
   >>>> happen when we no longer have a shared world of facts which we can   
   >>>> refer to?   
   >>>   
   >>> When was this not the case?   
   >>   
   >> When you collide with someone.   
   >>   
   >   
   > When you jump off a cliff? Oh, that would be another case of colliding.   
   > ;) I am fascinated by people who argue there are no facts and no eternal   
   > world for two reasons.   
      
   Eternal or external?  Can you prove an infinite amount of   
   time without living forever to prove eternity exists?  Or   
   is that a guess or indirect inference?   
      
   Of course if you are talking about mind then does a mind   
   have an interior or exterior?   
      
   Eternal or external, was that a typo?  Does arguing   
   for or against something imply that something can be   
   proven or disproven?  Doesn't everyone have different   
   definitions of that anyway?   
      
   > 1. They tend to hurt when they hit a rock.   
   >   
   > 2. They have never managed to disprove the world.   
   >   
   > 3. Even if they do not believe in the world and facts, they still seem   
   > pretty intent on arguing their point with other people, even though   
   > there is no point to argue. ;)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)