From: nospam@example.net   
      
   On Thu, 11 Jul 2024, x wrote:   
      
   >> And ethics falls, and meaning too. But, a solipsist position is   
   >> impossible to disprove, even though I argue, that the burden of proof   
   >> lies on the solipsist to disprove the world, rather than for the world   
   >> to disprove the solipsist.   
   >   
   > Everyone has different meanings of proof and disproof.   
   >   
   > Does the word 'proof' have meaning?   
      
   For me, I think we can go with the scientific meaning of proof.   
      
   > In theory, one could quote a bunch of philosophic   
   > 'proofs' and 'disproofs', but is there really   
   > agreement even among philosophers that they are   
   > actually valid or invalid?   
      
   In terms of proof, mathematical/logical proof and scientific criterias   
   for proof are pretty undisputed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)