From: nospam@example.net
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, oldernow wrote:
> On 2024-08-07, D wrote:
>
>>>> One thing you could conclude is that the YOU MUST ACCEPT
>>>> behaviour could be due to a bad childhood which left
>>>> psychological scars and warped the needs the person has. A
>>>> kind of narcissistic illness.
>>>
>>> Seems a reasonable theory/conclusion.
>>>
>>>> Then, the interesting question is... what happened to
>>>> bringing up children in the 70s and 80s so that we today
>>>> have this annoying trans people? Was there some kind of
>>>> paradigm shift in bringing up children?
>>>
>>> How to identify the factors, their relative impact, and
>>> then measure them now, then, and before then in order to
>>> have sufficient data for conclusion?
>>
>> Very difficult! But if we solve this problem here in
>> alt.philosophy I bet we could get a Nobel peace prize or
>> two! ;)
>
> It's already been solved by Jesus and others, but don't
> expect self-centric egos to rush embrace practicing leading
> until selflessness.
Ahh... that reminded me of my dream of a book projects, where I
deconstruct the lessons of Jesus when it comes to transcendence and
living a good life, into their essence, remove the religious stuff, and
sell it to the masses! The hope is that it then will be accepted, when
cloaked in a "scientific" (TM) shroud!
>> Jokes aside, it is not that far away, so at least it is still possible to
>> round up parents from the different generations and compare their
>> memories, thoughts and ideas.
>>
>> Another thing I'm thinking is if the answer is trivial and
>> known by psychologists since decades back, but, that we
>> have no interest, time or resources to actually implement
>> those policies.
>
> decades -> millennia (per the above)
Yes, maybe I was a bit modest with my guess. ;) After all, they did have
children millennia ago too, and here we are!
>> Or... what _if_ stay at home mothers, with their
>> biologically superior empathy and caring is the key
>> to raise children with a emotionally secure base... how
>> would that go down with todays militant feminists and woke
>> warriors? ;)
>
> Too bad that's rocket science for self-centric beings.
Yes, it does seem like common sense is in decline.
>> I read about a movement called the "Trad wife" movement
>> where the arguments by some women is that they feel happier
>> and more female assuming the role of a traditional stay
>> at home mother, caring for the family, and therefore they
>> reject the prevailing norm of todays society that women
>> must be like small men. This is enormously provocative for
>> social justive warriors. I always smile when I encounter
>> those conflicts! =)
>
> Again, simple stuff for those who get their self out of
> the way.
>
>> I think that is also an interesting idea. Not everyone
>> should be a parent, and some people should be actively
>> forbidden from procreating for the sake of themselves _and_
>> their potential children. This is also taboo to bring up in
>> todays society where everyone is entitled to everything. ;)
>
> There's no limit to the stupidity unearth-able by selfish
> selves.
>
>>>> Modesty forbids me from saying that I think it was an
>>>> excellent upbringing that yielded excellent results. ;)
>>>
>>> It certainly yielded fine language usage and typing
>>> skills. But I'd have to hear from your wife on the
>>> rest.... :-)
>>
>> You're very kind! However, my wife calls everyone I
>> interact with online the "freak show" so I doubt she would
>> be willing to make an appearance here. ;)
>
> She's definitely got it right in my case! ;-)
Hah! A confession! She will loooove this! ;)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
