From: dnomhcir@gmx.com   
      
   oldernow writes:   
      
   > For me, there is a class of thoughts indicating possible   
   > exits from thinking. All the rest seem procrastinatory   
   > distraction from those.   
   >   
   > That's not to say that forming sentences that flow   
   > pleasantly in meter/syllable/rhyming kinds of ways   
   > isn't fun.   
   >   
   > But, ultimately, that activity enlists thinking, which   
   > seems identical to ignore-ance to me: aka ignore-ing   
   > beneath the opaque thinking/thought clutter.   
   >   
   > The thought of I/me - and all thoughts that follow   
   > (i.e. can be discriminated) from that - get in the way,   
   > "are the problem", and so on.   
   >   
   > It's kind of hilarious, really, that the problem should   
   > seek a solution to the problem but, of course, always   
   > in non-serious ways, i.e. ways that couldn't eradicate   
   > the problem.   
   >   
   > Something like that....   
      
   "Human thinking is born out of some sort of neurological defect in the   
   human body. Therefore, anything that is born out of human thinking is   
   destructive."   
      
   "Thought is opposed fundamentally to the functioning of this living organism."   
      
   Etc, etc.   
      
   https://people.well.com/user/jct/enemy1.htm   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|