Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,348 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 169,559 of 170,348    |
|    oldernow to All    |
|    "They Said It Was Simple"    |
|    25 Aug 24 23:05:25    |
      From: oldernow@dev.null              "They Said It Was Simple" - Wei Wu Wei              31. They Said It was Simple              STRANGE TO SAY - and how rare it is! - the term 'phenomena'       implies precisely what etymologically it says. Every       thing, every conceivable thing, that our senses, and       our mind (which interprets what our senses perceive)       cognise, is exactly an 'appearance', i.e., an appearance       in consciousness interpreted as an event extended in space       and in duration and objectified in a world external to that       which cognises it. And simultaneously that which cognises       it assumes that it is the subject of the cognition and,       as such, an entity apart from that which is cognised.              As long as these associated assumptions subsist, the       correlated assumption of 'bondage', and the painful       sensations accompanying that assumption, must necessarily       remain intact.              Therefore release from this assumed 'bondage' can only be       obtained by comprehending the falsity of these assumptions       which are responsible for the presumed bondage, for both       'assumptions' and 'bondage' are apparent only, i.e.,       are purely 'phenomenal'.              'Appearance' is precisely what the word implies, i.e.,       something that 'seems to be', not 'something that is'.              If this is realised - and how obvious it should be, since       the terms themselves say it precisely! - the psychological       elements of a purely psychological bondage are severed,       and only the psychological conditioning occasioned by       that 'bondage' remains, and this, like all conditioning,       will dissolve as a result of a process of de-conditioning       which consists in the establishment of the concept of       'appearance' (phenomenon) in place of the concept of       'reality'.              The dissolution of that which is cognised as 'real' and       'separate', as events extended in space and in time,       necessarily involves the dissolution of the assumed       cognising entity, and both are then seen as phenomena,       or appearance, in consciousness.              When this readjustment is effected both subject and       object no longer exist as such, and no entity remains       which could be conceived as being 'bound'. That is -       bondage is no more.              How very simple indeed it is!              Note: 'Then who am I?' If anyone could tell you that,       what you were told would necessarily be nonsense - for       it would be just another object, as phenomenal as the       rest. Some day you will know automatically what you are -       which is what the Masters meant when they said so often,       'You will know of yourself whether water is tepid or cold'       - or, you will just be that knowledge.              --       Oh, for the love of signature silliness....              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca