From: oldernow@dev.null   
      
   On 2024-08-27, Richmond  wrote:   
      
   > Having said that, I agree with the conclusion of the text,   
   > which is that the duality is not real. But it is not real   
   > because I am not real, or rather I am only a part of it,   
   > rather than because the external world is not real.   
      
   As hinted in a previous reply, thinking about it - which   
   is words based, and words presume an objective reality -   
   guarantees missing it.   
      
   The cognizing magically (or, for the more religious, "by   
   grace") stops, revealing  that was never not,   
   but seemingly was not for being covered by a thick layer   
   of opaque ("objective") cognizing....   
      
   --   
   Oh, for the love of signature silliness....   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)