Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 169,638 of 170,335    |
|    D to Ed Cryer    |
|    Re: Philosophy, ancient and modern    |
|    25 Jan 25 18:49:27    |
      From: nospam@example.net              On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, Ed Cryer wrote:              > D wrote:       >>       >>       >> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, Ed Cryer wrote:       >>       >>> D wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, Ed Cryer wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> D wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, Ed Cryer wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> The word is Greek; it means "love of wisdom".       >>>>>>> Ancient philosophers pursued knowledge and understanding. They       >>>>>>> included what we'd call "science", but over the ages such things have       >>>>>>> been stripped off and rebranded as the "empirical sciences".       >>>>>>> Philosophy is left with not much more than an inquiry into the very       >>>>>>> tools of understanding. Reason itself.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Ed       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Would you say there can ever be progress in philosophy?       >>>>>       >>>>> I think not. It gets added unto over the ages; e.g. philosophy of       >>>>> science, linguistic analysis. But I agree with your underlying       >>>>> supposition.       >>>>>       >>>>> Even so, I think it has its uses. It makes you aware of the limits of       >>>>> human understanding; of how much that we accept as truth is       >>>>> fundamentally flawed.       >>>>>       >>>>> Ed       >>>>       >>>> So you would not say that the fact that philosophers no longer debate how       >>>> many angels fit on the head of a pin is progress? Or perhaps it is more       >>>> due to progress in science?       >>>       >>> British philosophers love using foreign words; especially German ones.       >>> Let's try a "Gedankenexperiment".       >>       >> I am fluent in german but I find it strange that philosophers love to mix       >> in german and latin.       >>       >>> A university has three departments side by side; philosophy, theology,       >>> physics.       >>> A notice appears on a signboard outside, saying "Tonight's speaker will       >>> talk about how many angels ..... etc.       >>>       >>> In which dept would you take a seat?       >>       >> Physics! I would be very interested to hear what physicists have to say       >> about the subject.       >>       >> At the risk of showing my hand, I didn't think theology departments still       >> existed in serious universities.       >>       >>>       >>>       >>> Ed       >>>       >>>       >       > In his book "Confessions of a Philosopher: A Journey Through Western       > Philosophy" Bryan Magee claims that all the major questions of western              I like his TV-show. I have, I think, all episodes on my TV computer for       quick and easy access for when I'm in the mood for a nice discussion.              > main-stream philosophy occurred to him in his lived childhood experience.       > Well, they didn't in mine. I only became aware of them when I read about       > them.       > OK, so I'm thick.       >       > However, I can recall what turned me into books of philosophy.       > I was always an avid reader, and I constantly came up against statements that       > the world wasn't real, that it was a product of mind.       > This I couldn't swallow, so I started reading about idealism, and was swept       > off my feet by it all. This philosophy was better than chess.              Interesting. I thought all youth have a period when they go through an       idealist phase, but eventually grow out of it. I studied philosophy at       university, and over the years, I've landed firmly in the materialist       camp, with a nice little agnostic twist, delivered by G.E. Moores "here's       a hand" argument.              I have found no better argument for the material world. The problem though       is that it is so simple that people think it is childish and don't take it       seriously.              > Philosophy is interesting; it engages you and keeps away the gremlins of       > boredom. Peeling away the skins of ignorance and prejudice, seeking out the       > bedrock of our existence; it's like sending protons around a large hadron       > collider, and looking for some Higgs Boson in the resulting mix.              True.              > Ed              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca