From: ed@somewhere.in.the.uk   
      
   oldernow wrote:   
   > On 2025-03-02, x  wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Seeing seeing seeing reveals functional void that all else   
   >>> seen is reflection of.   
   >>   
   >> Does it require 'thought'?   
   >   
   > It (the original statement) requires seeing seeing seeing   
   > (i.e. itself).   
   >   
   >> Does it require 'meaning' to 'see'?   
   >   
   > It doesn't for me.   
   >   
   >> What is 'thought'?   
   >   
   > A word that to you means whatever you believe if means.   
   >   
   >> What is 'seeing'?   
   >   
   > A word that to you means whatever you believe if means.   
   >   
   >> What is 'reflection'?   
   >   
   > A word that to you means whatever you believe if means.   
   >   
   > The point isn't to know something about the meaning   
   > of words, and possibly agree with others about said   
   > meaning. It's for seeing to see seeing.   
   >   
   > Try it.   
   >   
      
   Does thought precede sense perception with babies?   
   I would say not. Mind develops from interaction in the world, and that   
   is due almost exclusively to seeing and hearing and touching etc.   
   That is why children need looking after for so long; time to let mental   
   activity develop.   
      
   Ed   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)