From: nospam@example.net   
      
     This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,   
     while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.   
      
   On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, oldernow wrote:   
      
   > On 2025-03-11, D  wrote:   
   >   
   >> I don't understand your sentences.   
   >   
   > My condolences.   
      
   You are a very kind man! =)   
      
   >> Could you explain more clearly?   
   >   
   > Could you try to better prepare your mind to be more in   
   > accord with mine - especially when it comes to the meanings   
   > of words - that you might understand better?   
      
   )   
      
   >> Science is a method. I think if you put your mind to it,   
   >> you would be able to tell.   
   >   
   > Science has become mostly a sham attempting to lend   
   > higher credence/authority to vested money interests.   
      
   I see your point here. For some, science is a religion. This is not good,   
   and is related to what you say.   
      
   For others, science is a method for discovering truth.   
      
   For other still, science is a method for developing models which we can   
   just to predict events in our world.   
      
   >> Science has had enormous successes, and the fact that you   
   >> do not know if eggs are good for you or not, does not lead   
   >> us to throwing away the scientific method.   
   >   
   > But it did lead to at least one of us to throwing away   
   > the *claim* that what is actually vested money interest   
   > is "scientific method".   
      
   I will rehabilitate you!   
      
   >> I'll end this now. This makes no sense and is just a waste   
   >> of time.   
   >   
   > Baaaaalk buck buck buck buck buck! ;-)   
      
   Touché! This might have been the best argument of them all, don't you   
   think? ;)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)