From: x@x.org   
      
   On 3/13/25 09:20, vallor wrote:   
   > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:35:46 -0000 (UTC), oldernow    
   > wrote in :   
   >   
   >> On 2025-03-13, x  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I think I will go out on a limb and say that if time is possible   
   >>> without me being directly there to observe it, then this may have   
   >>> happened before any of my direct memories.  These ideas may be based   
   >>> upon indirect inference.   
   >>   
   >> Time/space are core notions of a modeling of an alleged external   
   >> reality. To seemingly experience time and space is to experience said   
   >> modeling as though more than merely modeling.   
   >   
   > How does one _not_ experience time?   
   >   
   > Or regarding the "experiment" that "D" suggested:  how does one _not_   
   > experience gravity on the Earth?  Gravity is a very strict law of nature!   
      
   I am thinking that the weak link in your rhetorical   
   statement is the word 'experience'.   
      
   I am thinking that in the fictional series 'Deep   
   Space Nine' some residents of a 'wormhole' may   
   have experienced time differently?   
      
   However one could argue that mathematics is an   
   'abstraction' and potentially no more 'real' than   
   science fiction or video games.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)