From: nospam@example.net   
      
   On Fri, 14 Mar 2025, oldernow wrote:   
      
   > On 2025-03-13, D  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Fear not my good man, and let our brave physicists explore   
   >> time and space!   
   >>   
   >> Time is a measure of the duration between events, allowing   
   >> us to understand the sequence and pace of occurrences in   
   >> our universe. It is a fundamental concept that enables us   
   >> to make sense of change, motion, and the evolution of the   
   >> world around us. Time can be defined as a dimension that   
   >> governs the flow of events, with past, present, and future   
   >> being the three primary components.   
   >>   
   >> In physics, time is often described as the fourth   
   >> dimension, in addition to the three spatial dimensions of   
   >> length, width, and height. This concept is central to our   
   >> understanding of the universe, from the laws of motion   
   >> and gravity to the behavior of subatomic particles.   
   >>   
   >> In physics, space is often described as a combination of   
   >> three dimensions: length, width, and height, which are   
   >> commonly represented by the coordinates x, y, and z. This   
   >> concept is central to our understanding of the universe,   
   >> from the behavior of subatomic particles to the expansion   
   >> of the cosmos itself.   
   >>   
   >> Let me also add to that, that we do not actually need any   
   >> ideas or notion when it comes to time and space. We can all   
   >> act freely and perfectly well without any acknowledgement   
   >> or conscious idea of time and space. In fact, humanity   
   >> has done so for 1000s of years.   
   >>   
   >> Time and space can also be mental tools to be used when   
   >> doing math and science.   
   >   
   > I get a kick out of how people think they're going to   
   > reveal some external reality using words, and then their   
   > offering turns out to be just so much " is  of other words>", which reveals to me nothing about an   
   > external reality while telling me a lot about how an   
   > individual believes words they know are related.   
      
   Well, I think in that case, usenet is probably the wrong medium for you.   
   As I said, if you want proof, open your eyes and look at the world. If you   
   doubt your senses, you have refuted yourself, since any conversation then   
   becomes meaningless, since you cannot even be certain about the words you   
   are reading, or the thoughts you are thinking.   
      
   > And yet they remain convinced they've revealed some   
   > external reality to me!   
      
   As I said... if you deny your senses, a good pscyhologist hopefully will   
   clear that up. =)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)