Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 169,964 of 170,335    |
|    D to Ed Cryer    |
|    Re: Heroism amidst evil    |
|    27 Mar 25 22:02:07    |
      From: nospam@example.net              On Thu, 27 Mar 2025, Ed Cryer wrote:              >> Of course not! I pass judgment. My point is that killing is not inherently       >> wrong. It is just an act. What makes it wrong is our human, subjective       >> judgment of killing.       >>       >> Sorry for being unclear about that.       >>       >>> Ed       >>>       >       > I'm sorry to say this, D, after all your stringent efforts to support logical       > positivism, but your moral stance seems ivory-towerish to me; rather like              I'm sorry for being unclear Ed. =( My stance has nothing to do with logical       positivism. Check out constructive empiricism is you're interested. It's       probably the closest to my stance.              > oldernow's abstention from reality.       > The thing about actual lived life in a community is that you have to act;              I have not argued against acting.              > leaders aren't chosen from people who say wait for further irrefutable       > evidence, not while the opposition is acting. And that means you need a moral       > code, a manifesto to uphold.              Definitely. I argued for that it is subjective, and not based on "moral       particles" in the world. Nothing I said is incompatible with having a moral       code.              The fact that someone does something wrong, does not mean I am obliged to do       something wrong. I think pacifism is a great example. Two wrongs does not make       one right.              > Of course "our human, subjective judgment of killing" makes it wrong, but       > whose subjective judgement are we waiting for?              Yours, mine, or whom ever is involved in the decision.              > Going back to the Hitler youth who stopped a Russian tank, I commend him. He       > did good. Yes, I know the Third Reich cause was evil, I know what history has       > revealed about it all. But that young lad did right; he defended what he       > thought was right. He acted in defence, while the enemy moved in.              Ok. I have no quarrel with your opinion. I do not understand, you seem to be       upset. I think maybe you misunderstood my point.              > Ed       >       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca