From: dnomhcir@gmx.com   
      
   oldernow  writes:   
      
   > On 2025-04-06, Richmond  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Only if you require proof of everything. But actually, making   
   >> assumptions is quite normal. There is no reason you can't assume that   
   >> sense evidence is a source of knowledge, without being able to prove   
   >> it. But what you have done is said that it is problematic to manage   
   >> without it and therefore someone else must prove it is false. How could   
   >> someone prove than sense evidence is not a source of knowledge? by   
   >> proving that no piece of knowledge was ever derived from sense evidence?   
   >   
   > The proof is in the believing.   
   >   
   > Or so "I" believe, at any rate....   
      
   The reader observed finding this, which the writer might like:   
      
   https://archive.org/details/NagarjunaTheFundamentalWisdomOfTheMi   
   dleWay/page/n51/mode/2up?view=theater   
      
   "Not only does suffering not exist   
   In any of the fourfold ways:   
   No external entity exists   
   In any of the fourfold ways."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)