From: oldernow@dev.null   
      
   On 2025-04-07, Richmond  wrote:   
      
   >>>>> Only if you require proof of everything. But actually, making   
   >>>>> assumptions is quite normal. There is no reason you can't assume   
   >>>>> that sense evidence is a source of knowledge, without being able to   
   >>>>> prove it. But what you have done is said that it is problematic to   
   >>>>> manage without it and therefore someone else must prove it is   
   >>>>> false. How could someone prove than sense evidence is not a source   
   >>>>> of knowledge? by proving that no piece of knowledge was ever   
   >>>>> derived from sense evidence?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The proof is in the believing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Or so "I" believe, at any rate....   
   >>>   
   >>> The reader observed finding this, which the writer might like:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://archive.org/details/NagarjunaTheFundamentalWisdomOfT   
   eMiddleWay/page/n51/mode/2up?view=theater   
   >>>   
   >>> "Not only does suffering not exist In any of the fourfold ways: No   
   >>> external entity exists In any of the fourfold ways."   
   >>   
   >> How *DARE* you attempt to peddle solipsist tripe in these sacred,   
   >> hallowed textural grounds!   
   >   
   > Subjective pronoun error. How dare you use the word 'you'   
   > when you don't exist.   
      
   Other cartoon characters do it all the time.   
      
   --   
   NPC's dutifully ignored.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)