From: dnomhcir@gmx.com   
      
   oldernow  writes:   
      
   > On 2025-04-07, Richmond  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> Only if you require proof of everything. But actually, making   
   >>>> assumptions is quite normal. There is no reason you can't assume   
   >>>> that sense evidence is a source of knowledge, without being able to   
   >>>> prove it. But what you have done is said that it is problematic to   
   >>>> manage without it and therefore someone else must prove it is   
   >>>> false. How could someone prove than sense evidence is not a source   
   >>>> of knowledge? by proving that no piece of knowledge was ever   
   >>>> derived from sense evidence?   
   >>>   
   >>> The proof is in the believing.   
   >>>   
   >>> Or so "I" believe, at any rate....   
   >>   
   >> The reader observed finding this, which the writer might like:   
   >>   
   >> https://archive.org/details/NagarjunaTheFundamentalWisdomOfTh   
   MiddleWay/page/n51/mode/2up?view=theater   
   >>   
   >> "Not only does suffering not exist In any of the fourfold ways: No   
   >> external entity exists In any of the fourfold ways."   
   >   
   > How *DARE* you attempt to peddle solipsist tripe in these sacred,   
   > hallowed textural grounds!   
      
   Subjective pronoun error. How dare you use the word 'you' when you don't   
   exist.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)