From: dnomhcir@gmx.com   
      
   oldernow  writes:   
      
   > On 2025-04-07, Richmond  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>> Only if you require proof of everything. But actually, making   
   >>>>>> assumptions is quite normal. There is no reason you can't assume   
   >>>>>> that sense evidence is a source of knowledge, without being able to   
   >>>>>> prove it. But what you have done is said that it is problematic to   
   >>>>>> manage without it and therefore someone else must prove it is   
   >>>>>> false. How could someone prove than sense evidence is not a source   
   >>>>>> of knowledge? by proving that no piece of knowledge was ever   
   >>>>>> derived from sense evidence?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The proof is in the believing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Or so "I" believe, at any rate....   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The reader observed finding this, which the writer might like:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://archive.org/details/NagarjunaTheFundamentalWisdomOf   
   heMiddleWay/page/n51/mode/2up?view=theater   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Not only does suffering not exist In any of the fourfold ways: No   
   >>>> external entity exists In any of the fourfold ways."   
   >>>   
   >>> How *DARE* you attempt to peddle solipsist tripe in these sacred,   
   >>> hallowed textural grounds!   
   >>   
   >> Subjective pronoun error. How dare you use the word 'you'   
   >> when you don't exist.   
   >   
   > Other cartoon characters do it all the time.   
      
   Two wrongs don't make a writer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)